Is Slack safe with your data?
Slack
Salesforce (Slack Technologies)
Good disclosure · high confidence
Slack earns a B (65/100) because it discloses most of its data practices.
#29
of 211 apps ranked
65
score · Meeting intelligence avg 61
+4
vs category average
Slack's public policy discloses no-train for LLMs with a named opt-out for global models, strong data-subject rights, named sharing recipients and SCC transfers, but is thin on retention periods, synthetic-output marking, named security controls and breach notice.
What Slack's privacy policy and terms of service say about your data
No LLM training
Slack states Customer Data (messages, files) is not used to train LLMs, with a named opt-out mechanism for global ML models.
Strong rights
Access, deletion, correction and objection rights are all named with concrete contacts (privacy@slack.com, dpo@slack.com).
Weak security disclosure
Security section names no concrete controls (no TLS/AES/RBAC), gives no breach-notice timeline, and retention is only 'as long as necessary'.
Ownership vs reuse
Terms say Customer owns Customer Data but do not clearly limit provider reuse to the service, so D1.4 is only partial.
What the policy is silent or vague on
- Not stated: data portability
- Not stated: a deletion timeline after closure or request
- Not stated: shorter retention for AI conversation logs
- Not stated: marking of AI-generated output
Slack privacy rating
Details
- Category
- Meeting intelligence
- Modalities
- text, audio
- Processes biometrics
- No
- Policy last updated
- 2023-07-05
- Region scored
- Global / US-default
- Last assessed
- 2026-07-08
Documents examined
Other meeting intelligence apps
Each grade reflects our analysis of what an app states in its public privacy policy and terms as of the assessment date. It measures the transparency of those documents, not the company's actual data practices, security, or compliance. Grades are our opinion, offered for general information. Full disclaimer.