Colorado SB 26-189
Colorado rewrote its AI law before the original ever took effect. SB 26-189 repealed and replaced the 2024 Colorado AI Act. Gone are the high-risk classification, the required risk management programme, the yearly impact assessment and the duty of care. What is left is a transparency law. Tell people when software plays a real part in a decision that affects them. Explain a negative outcome within 30 days. And offer a human review that means something.
At a glance
Covered technology
ADMT materially influencing a consequential decision
Core duties
Notice, adverse-outcome explanation, human review
Explanation window
30 days from an adverse decision
Materiality test
Output is a non-de-minimis factor in the outcome
Enforcement
Colorado Attorney General, with rulemaking due by the effective date
Watch item
Subject to ongoing federal litigation (xAI LLC v. Weiser)
Who has to comply
- Deployers using ADMT that materially influences employment decisions in Colorado
- Deployers in housing, lending, education, healthcare, insurance and essential government services
- Vendors whose technology their customers deploy in those decisions
What the audit covers
- Whether a system's output is a non-de-minimis factor, which decides if it is in scope at all
- Outcome differences across demographic groups, as the evidence behind an explanation
- What drove an individual adverse decision, in terms a consumer can act on
- Records supporting notice, explanation and human review in practice
What non-compliance costs
Enforced by the Colorado Attorney General. They have to set rules on what adverse-outcome notices say and how they look, in time for the effective date. Enforcement will not start before that work finishes. A federal court has also stayed enforcement in xAI LLC v. Weiser.
Colorado SB 26-189 questions
Other regulations we audit against
NYC Local Law 144
New York City, USA
The first law anywhere to require an independent bias audit before an automated hiring tool can be used.
Illinois HB 3773
Illinois, USA
Makes discriminatory AI in employment decisions a civil rights violation, and bans zip code as a proxy for protected class.
California FEHA AI rules
California, USA
Brings automated-decision systems inside the Fair Employment and Housing Act, with four-year records and testing that cuts both ways.
Get audited against Colorado SB 26-189
One engagement can cover this and every other jurisdiction you operate in.